May
18
My countless tries of 'homography' using Diana F+. Countless. Fucking so many tries i'd tell you, till i'd almost gave up on lomography - my end products are such an ass, so far. It's like looking at an ordinary picture caught off from an old 1990s' Nikon camera. But nah, i'd still want to stick with this kind of thing.
Ive issues with its lens - i tend to cut off people's head due to parallax error between the viewfinder and the lens. Plus, im using a 75mm lens, thus it's like focusing one object 10x bigger.
In addition to that, im using the normal 35mm film like Kodak and Fuji, instead of the special lomography film, thus this explains the lack of 'saturation of colour' and 'vintage' look. Plus, vignettes were omitted from most of my 'countless tries' of photos, as im using 35mm film instead of a 120mm film. Lomography films are one heck of a price tag compared to the normal ones.
Lomography is an expensive hobby, other than golf (only if you count golf as a hobby, not a sport. Golf is a hobby, people) Haha.
38mm wide-angle lens, you're next.
Allow me to blabber more - Brunei shops does not have the privilege of 'cross-processing'. This surely would be really helpful if we're using on an E-6 film. E-6 film is also called slide film. Unlike the normal C-41 films, slide films produces such an amazing crazy highly saturated colours.
Oh lomography. My anticipation of vintage colours is the only thing that drives me, must not give up...
HAHA.
Out.
